Policy Solutions

Clean Dispatchable Power

Clean Energy On Demand

Advanced nuclear power, geothermal energy, and thermal generation with carbon capture can all help the U.S. reach net-zero emissions.

These technologies are dispatchable, which means they are useful complements to wind and solar resources which have limited ability to be dispatched and are sometimes not available when needed. As a result, clean dispatchable power sources help maintain the stability and reliability of the power grid.

While these technologies are at various stages of commercial development, new policies are required to deploy them at scale. Additionally, while all these technologies significantly reduce CO2 emissions, they vary in their performance on other environmental metrics like air pollution and waste management. Policies that seek to deploy these technologies should address these concomitant environmental risks, particularly those that disproportionately impact low-income communities and communities of color.

Market Challenges

  1. High Capital Costs and Access to Capital

    Dispatchable low-carbon power sources carry higher capital costs than conventional fossil fuels, onshore wind, and solar technologies—especially at commercial scale. Because of these challenges, developers usually face limited access to private-sector financing. As a result, they often struggle to compete with incumbent technologies.

  2. Regulatory Uncertainty

    Developers face licensing, permitting, and other regulatory hurdles when designing, constructing, and operating power plants and associated infrastructure like CO2 pipelines. These processes are important for protecting safety, health, and the environment, and regulation on CO2 storage is an essential complement to increased geologic injection. However each new plant may face multiple rounds of review, leading to longer project timelines and increasing risk.

  3. Public Perception

    Some clean dispatchable technologies face high levels of public scrutiny. Alongside significant local issues like waste management, the public places greater weight on risks that are perceived to be potentially catastrophic, such as a nuclear meltdown or a geological leakage. Both policy and technology have a role to play in addressing these concerns. For example, many new nuclear technologies have been designed with passive safety features that dramatically reduce the risk of nuclear accidents.

Technology Innovation Examples

Phases of Technology
Research and Development
Validation and Early Deployment
Large Scale Deployment

Nuclear power already provides about 10 percent of the world’s electricity, and this figure could rise as nuclear technologies that are safer (including having a lower risk of proliferation), cheaper, faster to build, and produce less nuclear waste are developed.

Researchers are currently investigating a wide range of next-generation fission technologies that improve on today’s Generation III+ reactors. These advanced reactors are characterized by the coolant they use—such as gases (like helium), liquid metals, and molten salt—and offer varying trade-offs between size, safety, cost, and complexity. They can also be built to prioritize resiliency from extreme weather events and the health and safety of nearby communities. Policies to deploy advanced nuclear power must ensure adequate safeguards for low-income communities and communities of color.

Advanced Nuclear
Researchers are exploring a wide range of next-generation fission technologies—like the helium-based reactor shown here—that improve on today’s Generation III+ reactors.

Creating energy from controlled nuclear fusion—the fusing of two atomic nuclei—has long been considered a key priority of clean energy R&D. If we can accomplish this feat, we can generate substantial amounts of zero-carbon energy while alleviating some of the challenges around safety, waste, and weapons proliferation associated with nuclear fission.

But despite more than 60 years of research, we have yet to achieve controlled fusion for energy production. Even when we do, making fusion cost-effective will remain a significant challenge. That said, innovative new approaches in recent years have given rise to a fusion technology renaissance that may still open the way to cheap, reliable, emissions-free fusion energy for the world.

In a nuclear fusion reaction, hydrogen isotopes deuterium and tritium fuse and recombine into a helium atom and a neutron, releasing energy in the process.

Geothermal electricity is generated by using an underground geothermal resource to heat water or another fluid, which then turns the turbine of a generator. If we can find a cost-effective way to tap into it, Earth’s vast reserves of deep geothermal heat present a huge opportunity to provide large amounts of zero-carbon power: experts estimate more than 1,000 GW are readily available in the U.S. alone.

Enhanced geothermal systems (EGS), which provide access to a wider range of temperatures and rock formations than conventional resources through new drilling and fracturing techniques, can open more parts of the U.S. to geothermal development. Advances in EGS will bring down costs and improve performance. New technologies for extracting heat at higher efficiencies from lower temperature resources can also expand the use of this vast, safe, and underutilized energy resource.

Geothermal Systems
A conceptualization of an enhanced geothermal system, with a man-made geothermal reservoir, is shown here.

In a fuel cell, electrons are split from fuel and pass through an external circuit, creating a flow of electricity. A variety of fuels can be used: hydrogen is the most common, and its only byproduct is water. Fuel cell technologies can help offset the inherent variability of wind and solar power.

When coupled with a hydrogen electrolyzer with hydrogen storage, this system could act as energy storage for the electric grid. For fuel cells to truly provide cost-effective flexibility on the distribution grid, we need transformational advances that make them significantly more affordable. The production of hydrogen for these fuel cells also needs to be decarbonized for the technology to become a viable alternative to fossil fuel-based incumbents.

Fuel Cells
A fuel cell utilizes a fuel—most commonly hydrogen—and oxygen to generate electricity through a chemical conversion process, with heat and water as the only byproducts of hydrogen fuel cells.

One of the most promising solutions for dramatically reducing CO2 emissions from large-scale fossil fuel power plants lies in carbon capture technologies. CO2 can be captured from the fuel before combustion via gasification or reforming, for example. It can also be captured from the exhaust gas of the plant, typically using a thermally regenerated amine-based process. The fuel can also be combusted in pure oxygen, resulting in a purer and easier to capture CO2 stream. The captured CO2 can then be put to a productive use or stored securely underground.

Further development of low-cost, highly efficient CO2-capture technologies can make this potentially powerful emissions reduction solution a widespread commercial reality, provided it is paired with policies and technologies that address other pollutants from fossil fuel production and combustion. Carbon capture technologies have faced some criticism from environmental justice and other groups concerned with local air quality and land use impacts. Durable policy support for these technologies should include consideration of all air quality and economic impacts, especially those affecting low-income and historically disadvantaged communities.

Power Generation with Carbon Capture
Operational since 1996, the Sleipner CCS facility in Norway is one of the world’s longest-running large-scale CCS projects, capturing and storing approximately 1 million tons of CO2 per year deep under the North Sea.

Hydropower provided 6.5 percent of total electricity and 40 percent of renewable electricity in the U.S. in 2018. While this is a carbon-free electricity source, constructing new dams often generates resistance, large hydropower projects are subject to cost and schedule overruns, and many old dams are nearing the end of their current permits and face challenges in re-permitting.

Distributed, low-head hydropower could resolve many of these challenges, but costs remain prohibitive. At the same time, existing technologies do not mitigate many of the environmental concerns associated with large dams, such as fish passage and ecological disruption. New kinds of turbines could help mitigate these concerns and enable more hydropower development, while streamlined permitting can accelerate existing timelines.

Next-Generation Hydropower
A modular hydropower approach, conceptualized here, could help new hydropower facilities meet site-specific parameters, as well as power generation and environmental goals. (Source: U.S. Department of Energy, energy.gov)

Clean Dispatchable Power Policy Recommendations